Pit Bull Law In Ontario Essay

The pit bull law is a touch and go law, it is one of those laws that doesn’t get enforced until this dog actually does something that would get it attention of the police, in which case they would take your pit bull away from you and put it down. Most people blame the bad reputation of pit bulls on bad owners, Pit bulls have been known as bad dogs since criminals started adopting them in the 70’s-80’s and using them in illegal dog fights and self defense dogs to protect drugs and money usually, pit bulls are very intimidating dogs that’s why they where chosen for all this stuff. Tons of sources and people all say that pit bulls make amazing family dogs, numerous people say that the key to a good dog is a good and loving owner, and make a great family dog that are good with kids and other animals only if trained right. The law is also hurting people too, there are a lot of pit bull breeders that are now not legally aloud to breed the only breed they know how to breed which is a violation of there rights. The government cant make you get rid of a pit bull you already own but there are very strict guidelines as to take care and keep these dogs away from society. The bill should be appealed, all dogs bite. Just these dogs need special attention just like every other dog to be a good dog. First of all the big reason why there is a ban on pit bull breeding and ownership of pit bulls is because of the bad reputation that they have accumulated over the past 40 or so years one of the first uses of the pit bull was to fight bears and bulls and stuff and people used that as entertainment, after that got banned for being rules as cruel to animals they came up with a new sport for the dogs which was to pin them up against each other in a pit for a fight to the death and people would bid money on the winners and ect†¦ the dogs where bred to kill. But it was made very illegal very fast and banned in all 52 states and Canada. That breed was very dangerous, but since the 80’s making that killer breed was illegal so that pure killing machine isn’t really around anymore but you cant take it all out of the gene, but it can be easily controlled with proper training and a loving owner. But that’s not always the case bad people do get there hands on these dogs to often and treat them with no respect, love or care and give don’t them proper obedience training. â€Å"Many of the pit bull attacks are due to a skyrocketing number of poorly bred and badly trained dogs raised by backyard breeders, who are trying to cash in on the pit bull’s growing reputation as a cheap, but deadly effective guard dog, particularly in urban areas.† This is a quote from The Houston Chronicle placing the blame almost solely on the humans. Before the 80’s pit bull attacks where almost unheard of in fact there where an American icon along with bull dogs. Pit bulls where used on military poster for the first world war and in other posters, the pit bull was in a lot of households across America. The second topic would be how this law in Ontario has affected people’s jobs in breeding. Because of the new law breeders that have perfected there breed and only have knowledge in the pit bull breed, now that that has been taken away from them it is violating there rights as people, they have been stripped of there jobs because of an unfair law that has no reason to even be a law. Ontario breeders argue the ban violates breeders’ constitutional rights. Hundreds of supporters of pit bull-type dogs gathered in front of the provincial legislature to protest. Other supporters, including the American Staffordshire Club of Canada, say that Ontario’s law is so vague and unscientific that it will affect many animals that shouldn’t be banned. In a widely reported case, Toronto police fired more than a dozen bullets into two pit bulls that had turned on the man who was walking them as a favor for a friend. In another in London, Ont., a woman and her seven-year-old son watched in horror as a pit bull latched onto her husband’s arm as he tried to keep the family puppy out of the dog’s reach. While some breeders are fighting the ban, others are leaving the province. Pit bulls aren’t really an identifiable breed, added Hillier, so the law only provides a physical description of dogs, which he said could be applied to many breeds. The vague description of pit bulls in the legislation — which speaks of broad shoulders, short hair and a wide forehead Pit bull bans are â€Å"ridiculous and cruel,† she added, and have already been lifted in other provinces, many U.S. states and countries around the world. Everyone knows it’s the deed, not the breed, that’s the problem. We know that German shepherds, we know that Labrador retrievers, we know that Chihuahuas are as capable of biting, or more capable of biting, as so-called pit bulls. What is trying to be said here is that there is no actually law on the breed of pit bulls its just a description and a very vague one at that, This law is very un organized, pit bulls are getting shipped out of Ontario and being pit down even when there not full pit bulls, they are mixes that fit the description. The original Bill 132 was passed on March 1, 2005, and received Royal Assent on March 9, 2005.The Bill prohibits individuals from owning, breeding, transferring, importing or abandoning pit bulls. Now that its 2012 the law has almost been considered being lifted completely it has in other provinces, Ontario is basically the only province that has not lifted it in Canada, and hopefully they let up soon, its unfair to all the breeders and pit bull lovers out there. In conclusion the Pit Bull has had a bad reputation since the mid 19 hundreds between the illegal dog fights and all the gangsters and terrible breeders using these dogs for attack dogs and to protect drugs, and money, and for intimidation, and ect. But truth is that killer breed has been gone for awhile now, its basically just mixes out there from bad breeders with bad owners, there is no such thing as a â€Å"bad† dog, every dog is capable of biting and being viscous, the pit bull is capable of being a good dog, pit bull owners all say, there dog is great with there kids and family and even strangers, other dogs are touchy but can be contained with proper training. Also it putting good breeders out of a job is unfair because they can be breeding great dogs not even the killer ones. It violates their rights and they have been fighting for them back since 2005. The Law is cruel and unusual and should be lifted. Work Cited 1.Arland Kent, pit bulls fighting there historical bad rep, April 2010, www.streetdirectory.com 2. Mrgrimwig, Why do pit bulls attack?, august 12, 2011, www.mrgrimwig.hubpages.com 3. Unknown, 10 common misconceptions about pit bulls. Febuary 10th, 2009, www.dogster.com 4. CBC news team, Pit bull ban begins, August 29th 2005, www.CBC.ca 5. Aaron Hall, Pitbull ban close to being lifted, February 24th 2012, www.ckdp.com

Spel Case

After killing the friend who was left with the shortest straw, the remaining plunders are rescued a couple weeks later and shared their story with their community. The friends are soon met with charges of homicide and disapproval from the public for their lack of moral awareness. This essay will argue that murder is Justifiable when the reality of grim conditions exists. Consequences from such an action do not come to mind when decisions are based solely on emotions and not made with morals and ethical obligations set by society.The spelunkers depended on the murder of one of their friends in order to survive. In a normal situation, these friends would never purposely hurt, let alone ill, one another. The Intent of the person killing Is something to consider. When confronted with the dilemma of having Limited resources, killing each other was the only option for food. The special circumstance these friends were faced with, led too violent act of survival. The spelunkers waited a week after being trapped before normally commit, but cannibalism is something they would not practice either.The thought of eating human flesh to the average person is not desirable. But when put in extenuating circumstances, the reasonable person would do anything in order to live. The immense amount of pressure the friends experienced in making this decision was heightened by the hunger in their bellies and the fear in their hearts. Still, aggression and violence is usually associated with murder. That is not the case in this situation. There was no plan to purposefully and maliciously kill one of their friends before they were trapped.Death was the inevitable future of the four friends and the act of killing the randomly chosen friend brought that reality forward. The system that the spelunkers chose in picking who would die for the greater good of the group was a fair method. One person was not singled out to be killed for any other reason besides having the shortest straw and to be the emergency food source. This is validates that killing one of their friends was only to increase their chances of living. Murder, even though a drastic measure to survive, was absolutely necessary due to the reality of their dire situation.Once the spelunkers were caved in, the reality of their fate was sealed and the probability of surviving this disastrous event was unlikely. The friends had no idea that a trip full of adventure and fun would lead to such a tragic decision. When the subject of reality comes up, the idea of life and existence follows. Human beings have instincts that help them adapt and thrive in unfortunate mishaps. When lives are threatened or challenged, the truth is, people will do anything in their power to save themselves. The case of the spelunkers is no different.Even though the idea of having to kill and eat their friend is unwelcome, it was the best option for survival. There are some things in life that are uncontrollable and the natural occurrence o f a cave-in is Just that. The spelunkers had no connection to the outside world and the session to kill and eat another human was made in the security of their own world, away from the rules of society. Though unintentional, the reality of the spelunkers' situation led to an irreversible decision, in which the consequences were an afterthought.Consequences usually have a negative connotation associated with them. The dire circumstances in which the friends were in, led them to make choices in order to survive. The repercussions the three friends would face were an afterthought in light of trying to survive. In the moment of making the decision to kill another human eyeing, the last thing on their minds was what people would think of them afterwards. They were simply trying to live. Instead of being regarded as brave and courageous in the eye of death, the remaining spelunkers were shamed and ostracizes from society for killing their friend.To be snubbed by the community where one li ves is very difficult to process, especially after the ordeal they Just went through. Then to be categorized as murderers and charged with homicide is unfair. The rules of law should not apply to special circumstances like the case of the spelunkers. If the here friends had not killed their friend and ate him, they would not be alive to tell their story. The consequences of being shunned by the community and being charged with murder, though unanticipated, undoubtedly stirred up emotions of guilt and shame for doing what they needed to do in order to survive. Tit feelings such as fear, despair, or hopelessness, the human mind can make decisions it would not normally. The spelunkers went through a spectrum of emotions before and after the killing of their friend. Being presented with such a calamitous situation, such as being trapped in a cave, can induce a state of panic and anxiety. As much as the four friends wanted to stay calm and wait patiently for help, the idea of dying was t oo frightening. The simple fear of not being able to survive due to limited resources prompted the idea of drawing straws.After the straws were drawn, reality set in that one of them would be eaten. And for the three friends to not feel remorse or guilt after killing their friend was nearly impossible. This act was not an easy one and the remorse and guilt will not go away. Without the sacrifice of the friend who died, none of the men would be alive. The friends are grateful and appreciative for their friend's sacrifice for them to live, yet sad and remorseful that their situation led them to that conclusion.Since the spelunkers were faced with fear they may not live, they acted with their emotions instead of the morals they would have normally abided by in everyday life. Having morals helps people chose from right and wrong doings. For the most part, the majority of humans would not result to violence or murder in a normal, everyday circumstance. There must be a catalyst for such b ehavior. In the case of the spelunkers, their feelings superseded moral consideration based on the fear of death. The emotionally charged spelunkers thought with their hearts and not with their minds.So is the difference between emotions and morals. The friendships that the four men shared were strong and the loyalty they had to one another was proven by the participation in drawing straws. This moral dilemma was the ultimate test of the bond the friends shared. The three friends should not be held responsible for murder based on their limited options of survival. The men's' morals did not come into consideration when trying to fight to stay alive. Though the decision to kill their friend for the benefit of the group's survival is questionable, the spelunkers should not be charged with homicide.Killing someone under any other circumstance is a plausible reason to arrest and charge someone of murder. But the reality of the situation is, if the spelunkers had enough resources and if e motions such as fear for survival did not exist, murder would not have occurred because their morals would tell them that the consequences for such action, such as the absence of their friend, being charged for murder, and being ostracizes, was not worth it. The truth is, the spelunkers had no other choice but to omit this powerful act if they wanted to stay alive.And, if they had not killed their friend, four people would be dead instead of Just one person. Every day, people are faced with moral dilemmas and controversial subject matters. Those people are no different than the spelunkers. Although the circumstances surrounding this controversy are not a normal, fear can drive people to do things they would not typically do. If the roles were reverse and if anyone else were in the place of the spelunkers, it would be a challenge for people to accept death without trying everything they could to survive.

It is never too late to give up our prejudices

People have always been and always will be prejudiced. There are prejudices of all kinds. Some have prejudices about skin color or religion, others about nationality or sexuality or something else. And other people are prejudiced about everything that they do not consider normal. Henry David Thoreau said: â€Å"It is never too late to give up our prejudices†. And for some people It Is true: they outgrow their prejudices and learn to be more unbiased.Then there are those who retain their prejudices all theirs life. People do not like to admit that they are wrong, so the latter are unfortunately the majority In our world. We can all agree that most prejudices are taught to us by our parents and the environment we grow up In. In the period of Nazism children In Germany and other Nan countries were taught from birth to hate Jews and Gypsies. It was the policy of government and It was dangerous to behave differently. Nowadays the majority of those people's descendants do not have t hese prejudices.They have learnt from their forefathers' mistakes and now are a lot more tolerate. Of course, there are still those who hate people of different nationality in different countries. There are still a lot of hate crimes, in which the victim is targeted because of his or her race, religion, sexuality and so on. While it is true that there are people so bigoted they can never let go of their prejudices, there are others who change theirs views and abandon their prejudiced ways. People are usually biased against things they have no idea about.So for them to let go of these prejudices they must learn about different things, get to know all kinds of people, make friends and try to see things from their point of view. Then they will be able to understand that different does not mean weird or freaky. Normality is overrated anyway. Everybody is deferent in one way or another. We are not robots after all to be the same. To be different, not like everybody else is wonderful. It does not make you a freak. Unfortunately people are afraid of those who are not like them and we usually hate something we fear.There was the UK Klux Klan in the USA. It was a secret organization of White Protestant Americans, mainly in the South, who used violence against Blacks, Jews, and other minority groups. They used to terrorize those they did not like. And these minority groups could very rarely find protection and Justice: if o were Black you had little to no rights. There are a lot films made and books written about this. Now the USA government proclaims tolerance: all people are equal under the law, have the same rights and responsibilities.Things change, people are too. It is the way of life. In my opinion, all people should be equal. We are all human beings at the end of the day. We all can and must learn to be as open- minded as possible. We must learn to live without hate and fear. These feelings nobody ever made happy. Therefore a life with no prejudices Is better th an with them. Our prejudices†. And for some people it is true: they outgrow their prejudices and unfortunately the majority in our world.We can all agree that most prejudices are taught to us by our parents and the environment we grow up in. In the period of Nazism children in Germany and other Nazi countries were taught from birth to hate Jews and Gypsies. It was the policy of government and it was dangerous to behave different in one way or another. We are not robots after all to be the same. To be Unfortunately people are afraid of those who are not like them and we usually hate nobody ever made happy. Therefore a life with no prejudices is better than with

An analysis of why strategic planning is important for FBI Research Paper

An analysis of why strategic planning is important for FBI Investigations - Research Paper Example According to Beinhocker (2006 pp 2), when preparing for strategic planning, the management should make sure that decisions made are in line with the strategy of the organization; hence, the management is able to respond effectively to challenges and also opportunities when they occur. An organization should also increase its innovativeness and an open mind to allow room for creative thinking. According to Hanna (1989, pp4), in his article, he emphasizes on the importance of strategic planning being flexible, selective and responsive, such that, it should increase creative thinking and understanding. In addition, managers must embrace the strategy and must aim at meeting the customer’s needs. The author further adds that the management should incorporate a clear mission, a well thought and communicated strategy, and the management drive, in which they are expected to be communicators and motivators to the rest of the staff. The federal bureau of investigation According to FBI ( 2007, pp5), the federal bureau of investigation (FBI) intelligence operations include the war against terrorism. The FBI priorities vary from protecting the United States against foreign intelligence operations and attacks via cyber and high tech crimes. ... Nevertheless, the threats on national security, for instance, the attempt on airline bombing during Christmas by the al Qaeda and the cyber intrusion at Google are some of the challenges that the FBI has had to deal with. Corruption cases are also numerous and so are health scams and ponzi schemes that affect the American citizens who rely on the FBI for justice. Why strategic planning is important for FBI Investigations According to Bryson (2004 pp 301), for an organization to be effective in its strategic planning, it needs to articulate the importance of strategic planning, whereby, they should highlight their competencies, changes, and the strategic issues that the organization is likely to face in the future. The organization should also be willing to commit resources such as money, time, and energy. The leaders should also emphasize that strategic planning will impact change that could be beneficial to the workforce. The management should also be to reward those participants th at contribute to creative thinking, as a way of motivating them for their contributions in creative ideas. Strategic planning is very important for any organization. In addition, it requires the consideration of both internal and external factors (Simerson, 2011 pp 16). Hence, it is evident that a strategic plan can be compared to a road map of an organization. The Strategic Planning Process Mission &   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Objectives  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚     Ã‚  Environmental  Ã‚   Scanning Strategy   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Formulation  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Strategy   Implementation  Ã‚     Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Evaluation  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   & Control Source: http://www.quickmba.com/strategy/strategic-planning/ Strategic planning process

Wal-Mart Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 1

Wal-Mart - Case Study Example People are supposed to be able to relax themselves and properly feed their bodies during the lunch break. â€Å"Lunch is really important for us to have a recharge of energy and just take a break† (Luckerson, 2012). The premise of Wal-Mart’s management that women are not interested in managerial positions is completely false. Women have the same goals and desires as men of moving up the corporate ladder. Unfortunately at Wal-Mart its corporate culture suffers from the glass ceiling effect. â€Å"The popular notion of glass ceiling effects implies that gender disadvantages are stronger at the top of the hierarchy than at lower levels and that these disadvantages become worse later in a persons career† (Cotter, Hermsen, Ovadia, Vanneman, 2001). Women at Wal-Mart are viewed as second class citizens that do not have the same opportunity for career growth as men. Women were systematically discriminated by Wal-Mart. Female workers accounted for 65% of the workforce, but only 33% of managerial positions. The company has not been able to truly take advantage of the virtues of diversity because of its discriminating stance against women. The position of Wal-Mart of not offering health care coverage up to par with the benefits other employees receive in the industry can be considered an ethical issue due to the fact that Wal-Mart is not attending the health needs of its workers. Wal-Mart has been hiding behind the excuse that it offers some health care coverage to part-time employees which many companies don’t to justify their extremely poorly designed health care benefit coverage. The reason that Wal-Mart’s medical plan is so poor is because Wal-Mart has been looking for everyway to save money on medical coverage for its employees. Wal-Mart pays $3,500 yearly on health coverage per employee which is over 40% lower than the industry standard. I do not think that Wal-Mart should be concerned with unionization of stores based on what occurred in the

Role of The HR Function Regarding the Management of People Within an Assignment - 1

Role of The HR Function Regarding the Management of People Within an Organization - Assignment Example The researcher states that the HR function assists in gauging a better idea how work processes get done and how people interact with one another. The HR function is therefore the lifeblood of any organization when it comes to their own people and the manner in which they are managed in an amicable way. The HR function was always remain imperative as far as the work realms are concerned because this ensures success for the organization from the long-term standpoint. The role of the first line supervisor or manager in managing people is necessary to understand as it paves way for a number of undertakings within the HR domains. The first line supervisor or manager oversees that all work tasks are being handled in a proper way and that there are no weaknesses that exist within the related realms. The aspect of managing people is such an important one that it can literally make or break the basis of any business in the time and age of today. It can be the cornerstone of achieving success or the complete failure of tasks which are closely related with the HR function within the organization. The first line supervisor or manager therefore finds out how work needs to be prioritized and the people for whom the work would be distributed and delegated to, so as to receive the output in a timely manner. The HR Manager is the person who is responsible for ensuring that all HR policies, procedures, codes, laws and rules are followed to the core. This is his role which would suggest that any good points or negativities exist within the system. When the problems are encountered, the HR manager is the first person who tackles these issues in a head-on way. He makes sure that all the tasks are taken care of and no problems would remain within the midst of achieving success for one and all. It is the HR manager’s responsibility which will dictate the basis of respect and dignity in terms of conformance for the HR functions which are available in the organization. The HR ma nager would always know what is happening in front of him and how he would bring the best value in terms of his business through the incorporation of his own resources, which are indeed the people working in different sectors of the organization. The HR department is responsible for the performance of employees within an organization. The employees usually look up to the HR management domains for finding out whether or not they are playing an active role within their work domains. It makes them remain one step ahead of how they are committing to work ethos and thus giving in performance which is up to the par and of excellent level. The HR department also tells the employees within an organization where they are lagging and what they need to do in order to remain proactively aligned with their respective work tasks and related areas. The performance of the employees would therefore always be judged when they are motivated enough to carry out their work in the best way possible. It w ould make them do their best and thus offer the organization best return on its resources that it has employed over a period of time.

Interpersonal Communication Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1

Interpersonal Communication - Essay Example The loathing effect is expressed even by her staffs who call her a witch when she is not around. She is a person who would give all for career and has no time for friendship or relationships. Outside the office, Margaret Tate is a woman who lives in her life. She is lonely as she has no time and traits for friendship. Her executive assistant, Andrew Paxton, is an ambitious individual who has a dream of becoming an outstanding editor. His stay as Margarets executive assistant is not easy since he loathes her as any other staff in the office. Besides, he has served Margaret Tate for three- years with the primary intention being to see his dream come true. One day Margaret learns that she cannot serve her capacity as the senior editor anymore; not because of her incompetence but out of her work visa expiration. The company board chair feels that she cannot continue with her job since she is to be deported to Canada. As she still tries to take in the news, Andrew appearance saves her day . In her smartness, she thinks quickly and tells Bergen, the board chair, that she is engaged to Andrew, and they are getting married soon. She later convinces Andrew that she will promote him to the editors post if he agrees to the proposal. In addition, she guarantees Andrew that his manuscript that he gave her to read will be published if the deal goes through. Andrew being a man of big dreams sees the deal as an opportunity to his success and agrees to it. After all, Margaret had convinced him that letting her lose the job would mean he also was going to be jobless. Mr. Gilbertson, an United States of American immigration agent, suspects that the two are up to committing fraud. He calls them for questioning and gives them time after which they will be asked questions differently, of which, failure to match will lead to heavy punishments. The couple traveled to Alaska to meet Andrews parents, a

Clinical Trial CONSORT evaluation Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Clinical Trial CONSORT evaluation - Assignment Example The author was also keen in providing a structured brief on the designs used, settings, number of participants, the intervention, measurements, limitations, results and conclusion. In fact the research was structured in a way that is very easy to read with objectives being very precise and prompt. However, it dint indicate in the abstract section the harm caused to anybody, funding and the registration of the research although they were reported in other sections The author did well in reporting the theoretical part of how Low back pain has been a significant condition worldwide due to its overall effect on work disability, absenteeism and the absolute cost on the victims. The statistical evidence in the theoretical review of the condition globally especially to the low month prevalence which was well reported to be 23.2% with a (standard error of the measurement being quoted at 2.9%) and higher in women and in patients aged between 40 and 80 years (Oliveira, Liebano, Costa, Rissato, & Costa, 2013). The scientific part was well reviewed with all implications of the process on the pain and non-biomechanical and biomechanical effects reported appropriately. The researchers did well in reporting the number of people involved in the study as well as the extended systematic review on changes in pain sensitivity following spinal manipulation. The readers from this review, gets to appreciate clearly the importance/need of this study to the said peo ple as well as the society by extension. He clearly reported how the process works basing his arguments on past studies to point to the rationale of the experiment. The author described well the trial design by indicating that they used a randomized controlled trial with a blinded assessor. He also discussed the software they used in the analysis to reduce statistical differences as windows excel and SPSS. Then he described eligibility

Archaeology Research paper, on the evolution, origin of bipedality, Essay

Archaeology Research paper, on the evolution, origin of bipedality, and the different perspectives on it - Essay Example The evolution into bipedality because of climate change and the alterations which have occurred in various regions of the world all provide support which shows that environmental stimulation has also regulated the evolution of men. Environmental Stimuli in Hominids There are several theories which show that the environmental stimulation in an environment also affects the way in which ontogeny, organismal adaptation and spectation occur throughout time. Most of the adaptation which has been noted with evolution is from the ideal that there is a response to the needs of a specific species as well as the requirements to survive within a given region. While the adaptation is noted as a component of evolution, many have disregarded the environmental stimuli and the way in which this has altered the functions and evolutionary changes. The concept of neo-Darwinism is one of the main approaches to this. According to Darwin, all species would respond with evolution by competition within the s pecies and with the need to survive. In the neo-Darwinism thought process, there is a link to the understanding that the physical alterations in a species occur specifically because there is the need to adapt to various elements in the surroundings, such as the environment (Vrba, 1442). While there are several links to physical alterations and dimensions related to why evolution occurs, adaptation to the environment is one of the considerations which has evidence in relation to evolution. This is also known as allopatic speciation, which fragments and segments species into various populations. When looking at these populations, it can be seen that the original homo sapiens were fragmented into one sector of the world. The environmental tables within these regions then included adaptation to components such as food intake, temperature, vegetation cover, light intensity and the climatic and tectonic changes. When a species adapted from one region, also known as the stenobiomic region to a eurybiomic, or across biome region, changes would have to be made in regards to the various elements of the environment. Adaptation to the environment, such as different types of water, responses from the skin because of the light and changing behaviors from the climate then become a part of the natural adaptation process, specifically from the environmental stimulus which has occurred (Vrda, 1446). Evolution Into Bipedality While environmental stimuli shows a direct relationship to the anatomical features of hominids and the potential adaptations which are a part of the evolution. According to the adaptability hypothesis, the evolution of individuals is based on the need to endure environmental fluctuations, specifically as different species began to move into different regions of the world. This is combined with the theory of the turnover hypothesis, which states that the adaptability to different environments occurred over a longer period of time and evolved specifically as the environment began to change. The evidence of this occurs in the African Pliocene which shows fossils as evidence of older species of hominids that are now extinct. The body shape, looks of the species and the physical applications draw evidence to the climate alterations and the functions of the society, such as stone making, which no longer fit into the environment. The timing that leads to the specific evidence of the species relates directly to features that show

Conflict Between Palestine and Israel Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Conflict Between Palestine and Israel - Essay Example I also discuss the current issues in the Israeli- Palestinian conflict. The fight between Israel and Palestine nation has been and continues to be bloody and yet, both nations have realized that the only chance for peace is compromising politically with the establishment of a Palestinian state that is self-ruled (Gelvin, 2007). The Jewish community occupied and expanded their settlement with about 220,000 populations in the West Bank, which belonged to the Arabs. The Arabs demanded withdrawal from the land because it was initially theirs from 1967. However, the Jews had migrated to Palestine in 1882 and by then, less than 250,000 Arabs lived there. Therefore, the Jews continued to expand their settlement (Gelvin, 2007). The Palestine groups that were involved in politically motivated violence were Hamas, Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine – General demand (PFLP-GC), Abu Nidal Organization and others. Almost all of these groups were founded to destroy Israel using violence. However, in 1993 PLO group renounced their aim by signing the Oslo Declaration of Principles and agreed to Honor a resolution that recognizes Israel’s right of existence. In return, PLO entered West Bank and Palestinians gained control in this area. Groups that objected to these agreements started suicide bombings on Israel. Since 2000, Palestinians have killed thousands of Israelis in terror attacks and in defense; the Israelis have killed over 3,500 Palestinians (Gelvin, 2007). At the beginning of the Oslo process, Israel responded to the violence started by Palestinians by cutting down the flow of workers from Palestine to Israel and strict checking at the boarder. The checkpoints made it difficult for Palestinians to work in Jerusalem or travel between their own towns. After year 2000, the Palestinian raids became severe and following this,